Which of the following is a metacognitive strategy for reading?

Which of the following is a metacognitive strategy for reading?

• A. Highlighting important information
• B. Clarifying a purpose for reading
• C. Reading at a consistent speed
• D. An unbiased review of the text

Answer: (B)

Clarifying a purpose for reading is a key metacognitive strategy because it involves an awareness of one's own thinking processes while engaging with a text. When readers set a clear purpose, they are more likely to monitor their understanding and adjust their strategies as needed, which enhances comprehension and retention of the material. This awareness allows them to focus on relevant information that aligns with their goals, making the reading experience more effective. In contrast, highlighting important information is a useful study strategy but does not inherently involve self-reflection or awareness of one's cognitive processes. Reading at a consistent speed does not encourage readers to think about their comprehension and could potentially lead to a mechanical approach rather than an engaged one. An unbiased review of the text may focus on summarization or critique but lacks the metacognitive aspect of reflecting on one's understanding and purpose while reading.

Clarifying a purpose for reading is a key metacognitive strategy because it involves an awareness of one's own thinking processes while engaging with a text. When readers set a clear purpose, they are more likely to monitor their understanding and adjust their strategies as needed, which enhances comprehension and retention of the material. This awareness allows them to focus on relevant information that aligns with their goals, making the reading experience more effective.

In contrast, highlighting important information is a useful study strategy but does not inherently involve self-reflection or awareness of one's cognitive processes. Reading at a consistent speed does not encourage readers to think about their comprehension and could potentially lead to a mechanical approach rather than an engaged one. An unbiased review of the text may focus on summarization or critique but lacks the metacognitive aspect of reflecting on one's understanding and purpose while reading.